Print off for the next lesson.
Part 1 -
Reading Comprehension
Read the text below and answer the questions
that follow.
Daniel’s Mum came. She was not unexpected; she had been coming for months. They had moved from a
council flat, Daniel’s home of choice, to this partially renovated artisan’s
cottage to make space for her when she was sufficiently better from her fall and
fractured hip. They decorated the third little bedroom for her before they finished their own, putting up a sprigged paper, installing a fat armchair, a fringed (5)table lamp, a satiny quilt and a dressing-table
with a glass top, all fetched by Daniel from the relinquished Sheffield house.
Visiting his mother in hospital made Daniel
morose and gloomy which Stefanie noticed but did not ask about. He remarked that he had almost certainly brought the wrong
objects , except the dressing –table , which
was alone of its kind. And it was fifty-fifty, he said, that that
would be said to be too big, which
it was, of course, in that room, taking up far too much
space . But it (10) had been the
same in the Sheffield house.
The
day she came , Stefanie went up and put
flowers on the dressing-table, a potted cyclamen, almost maroon in its dark
red-purple, a crystal vase,
a wedding present, containing
asters, violet, cherry-pink, shell pink. Brave and
graceful flowers. When Daniel
was at the station she remembered that the lamp had flickered alarmingly. She tried
it and it flickered. She went downstairs , fetched fuse wire and (15)screwdriver, went upstairs changed the fuse. She was
beginning to tire on the stairs. As she
worked a hand, or a foot, hard, protruding , worked its way under her skin,
outside her rib-cage. When she heard the
front door bell she was momentarily unable to
stand, the baby was moving about inside her so much. She had meant to open
the door, welcoming. Daniel’s mother’s voice came in, small, plaintive, continuous,
carrying.
(20) “ ….
Last time I ever go anywhere on them British
Railways. Any road, you’ll have
to carry me out feet first I reckon.”
Stephanie
came down. Mrs Orton spread like many heaped and plumped cushions in Daniel’s
armchair. Her clothes, her face, her hands, her glistening rounded legs
were many shades of what Stephanie later learned to call ‘mohve’*, like, yet, unlike, the innocent bright asters and cyclamen
, which now in (25)Stephanie’s mind resembled bruised flesh. She wore a moulded
oval felt hat , with various sheep-like curls of iron- grey soft
hair, with a purplish cast, perhaps simply a glow reflected from the shining expanse of
floral artificial silk
below. Stephanie, bumping her stomach against the chair arm, bent
to kiss the isolated, over-defined crimson apple- round of the
cheek. She offered tea.
“No thanks
, pet. I was just telling our Daniel, I was right put off by what passes for tea on t’railways these (30) days.
I couldn’t stomach no more. “
A.S. Byatt, Still Life
*mauve
1)
What do
we learn about the physical
condition of Daniel’s mother and of Stephanie ?
2)
What is Daniel’s attitude to his mother?
3) What
length of time is covered by
a) Lines 1- 10
b) Lines 11- 19
c) Lines 20 – 30 ?
4) In what
way do the bedroom furnishings and the furniture reflect
character?
5) What
impression are we given of Mrs Orton through the description of her clothes and overall
appearance ?
6) Mrs Orton’s character is also expressed through the use if direct speech.
How?
7) What
are the difference between Mrs
Orton and her daughter- in-law?
8) What expectations for further developments
are created in the reader’s mind?
Part 2 – Essay
Write an
academic essay on the following title ( approx. 400 words):
Use the empty space below for rough work.
1
2
3 To what extent has the traditional female role changed in the last twenty years?
PAPER 2
Translate the text below into Italian. Use the empty space below for rough work.
Il giudice Maye, di
cui, negli ambienti giudiziari londinesi, si loda il «divino distacco e la diabolica perspicacia» è
in servizio da vent’anni presso la litigiosa Sezione Famiglia dell’Alta Corte.
Un luogo in cui si combattono “battaglie
feroci per l’affidamento di figli non più condivisi, baruffe patrimoniali,
esplosioni d’irrazionalità cui il giudice Maye oppone un paziente esercizio di
misura e sobrietà nella convinzione di poter restituire ragionevolezza a
situazioni senza speranza”
Quando deve affrontare il caso di Adam Henry, un bel
ragazzo di diciassette anni che, sostenuto dalla famiglia e dalla comunità dei
Testimoni di Geova, cui appartiene, si rifiuta di accettare una trasfusione di
sangue che potrebbe salvargli la vita, il giudice impone tutto il potere
razionale del suo ruolo e del suo sistema di valori, per “preservare il
benessere del minore” come suggerisce il Children Act. Anche contro la
volontà del minore stesso e della sua famiglia. Fiona, in deroga all’etica
professionale, ha deciso di cercare un contatto diretto con il ragazzo e – complice
anche la fragilità della sua situazione sentimentale – si fa coinvolgere. Ma
solo fino a un certo punto. Oltre il quale il ragazzo, ora maggiorenne, dovrà
fare le proprie scelte da solo, nel più aspro dei modi.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento