giovedì 31 ottobre 2019

MLI 3 ASSIGNMENT 1

Complete the assignment below. Deadline: 8th November. Assignments will  NOT be corrected if you submit after this date.
If  you type your assignment use double spacing; if you write it by hand,please leave space for correction.


Translate the interview below.

E’ sempre stato  interessato  alla magia?
Da ragazzino ero un discreto  illusionista ed ero attratto   da qualunque cosa che avesse a che fare con la magia. Forse perché  speravo  che ci  fosse magia nel  mondo: l’ho  sempre cercata ma non l’ho mai  trovata. Sarebbe bello se qualcosa di  magico  potesse salvarci ma questa qualcosa
non esiste.
Che illusioni aveva da ragazzo?
Pensavo  che essere una movie star mi  avrebbe reso  felice. Che mi  sarebbe piaciuto  andare a Hollywood e vivere tra attori e attrici  bellissimi. Ma con il  tempo  mi  sono  reso  conto  che  a Hollywood non ci  volevo  andare. Che quella vita non sarebbe stata  la risposta a niente.
“ Se fossi  stato  meno  codardo il  mio  lavoro  sarebbe stato migliore” ha detto  una volta.  Che cosa intendeva?
Se  da giovani fosse stato  più  rigoroso e avessi  girato solo  quello  che volevo,cioè  storie serie e profonde, senza preoccuparmi del  successo  commerciale,forse avrei  diretto  film più  belli. Avrei  dovuto  avere più  coraggio.
Rimpianti riguardo  alla sua vita privata?
Rimpiango di  avere scelto troppo  spesso di  essere solo. E di  non essere stato  più  estroverso. Forse sarei  stato più  felice se avessi avuto  una vita sociale più  attiva.
E le donne?Rimpianti  anche con loro?
Rimpiango di  non essermi  sentito  più  sicuro:non osavo sognare che avrei  potuto  essere accettato.
Rimpiange di  non avere osato  con qualche attrice in particolare?
Quando  ero  giovane avevo  una cotta per Brigitte Bardot. Avrei  potuto  conoscerla , ma non ho  pensato  per un minuto  che qualcosa tra noi  sarebbe stato possibile.
Adesso è  più  sicuro  di  sé?
Adesso  sono  sposato  e sto bene. Ma non cambio personalità  da quando  avevo  14 anni e ho  ancora oggi  gli stessi  problemi di  allora.
Interview with Woody Allen, adapted from  Io  DonnaCorriere della Sera. October,2011.

domenica 27 ottobre 2019

magistrale 1

Complete the exercises taken  form Module 2 for 29th October:
1)      The underlined  words and phrases have been  written in an informal  way. Try to  rewrite them  using   more formal English. ( see reading text)
a)       machine-gunned a string of vulgarity
b)      cussing out
c)       learn to bite our tongues
d)      drop the F-bomb in Chinese
2)      Do  you agree with  the text? In your experience,  does your ability to  make sound judgments change when  you speak  another language? Write your answer below. ( Approx. 100  wds)

MLI 3 Material


Complete the test  below for Tuesday, 29th  March 

I.               Complete the second sentence so that it has a similar meaning to the first sentence, using the word given. DO NOT CHANGE THE WORD.

1)   I don’t think it’s possible he voted for Trump, he said he detested him! HAVE
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

2)   I regret not telling the truth. WISH

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
3)   He did not agree with the proposals I made. OBJECTED

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
4)   Finding a better place to live would make him much happier. IF

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
5)   She doesn’t come to lessons any more. STOPPED
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
6)   As soon as I graduated, I got a job. SOONER
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….


/6



 I.          Complete the text by filling the spaces with ONE word only.

Christmas is traditionally a time (1) ……………  giving  and for most of us, giving  (2) ……………buying– the perfect excuse for major retailers to conduct an advertising assault (3)  …………… pulls on our heart strings and empties our pockets.Seasonal TV adverts are usually full of signs and symbols   playing( 4)  ……………  our subconscious, and so far 2016 is no different.(5) ……………, this year, the adverts are a little(6)  …………… traditional, and some, perhaps, even have a political undertone.
This year John Lewis features animals (7) …………… the main characters in its Christmas advert. Most people consciously try not to be seduced by advertising, so using animals is a great way (8) …………… get people’s defences down as they simply see a cute dog or robin. As they focus on the animal, they unknowingly process the rest of the message, ensuring it (9) ……………….. be remembered.
Interestingly, in these cases, there are arguably subtle echoes of the uncertainty felt over Brexit. The John Lewis advert, for example, centres on Buster the Boxer. Buster is a name (10) …………….   can refer to things being broken in a positive manner, and hence (11) …………… reflect the division felt across the UK . The advert is filled with plenty of British “cues” – an archetypal British townhouse, a British phone box, and British wild animals – to (12) …………….. the viewer  subconsciously connect with the material based on feelings of nationality and home.


                                                                                                     /6


III. Analyze one of the following slogans

1)   Lilt. The totally  tropical  taste. ( soft fizzy drink)
2)   When The Times speaks, the World listens. (The Times newspaper,U.K.)
3)   You only get an 'OO' with Typhoo. ( Typhoo -  a brand of tea )
4)   It keeps going, and going, and going ………. ( Energizer batteries )
5)   Everything We Do is Driven by You. ( Ford cars )
/6



IV: Put the following text into English.


Una volta che  hai imparato ad andare in bicicletta, non lo scordi più", "andare sui pattini è questione di equilibrio, che una volta appreso non si dimentica": quante volte abbiamo ascoltato queste affermazioni, pronunciate come se fossero verità inscalfibili? Da oggi, tuttavia, bisognerà riconsiderarne il fondamento. Eh sì, perchè, secondo i risultati di una ricerca svedese, le cose non starebbero proprio così.La memoria muscolare non esiste. È questa la conclusione alla quale sono pervenuti i ricercatori del Karolinska Institutet di Stoccolma, secondo i quali l'abilità dei nostri muscoli di ricordare dei movimenti specifici anche dopo prolungati periodi di inattività non avrebbe fondamento scientifico.


lunedì 21 ottobre 2019

MAGISTRALE 1 - ASSIGNMENT 1


 Magistrale 1  - Assignment 1 
Submission date: Friday  25th October. Assignments will NOT be accepted after this date.

Viewpoint: are e-cigarettes really a menace?
E-cigarettes, devices that give you a nicotine-hit by heating up a liquid which you then inhale, have become (1) all the rage. But is the concern about them justified, asks Michael Mosley.
A few years ago they were a rarity, but (2) now there are nearly three million e-cigarettes out there. Many people think that they are as bad for you as normal cigarettes. But are they? I've recently spent a couple of months making a documentary about e-cigarettes, trying to find out truth behind the headlines. I took up heavy vaping (that's what you do when you inhale vapour from an e-cigarettes). I have never smoked anything before and I wanted to see what effects inhaling nicotine in the form of an e-cig would have on a non-smoker. The results surprised me.
(3) Everyone knows that smoking is bad for you and can lead to lung cancer. It also increases your risk of dying from a range of other conditions including heart attack, stroke and dementia. If you're a man you might like to know (but then again you might not) that smoking is one of the main causes of impotence.
Fans of e-cigarettes say vaping can reduce the burden of smoking either by making it easier for smokers to quit or by providing them with a safer way for them to get a nicotine hit. (4) Critics, however, say that we are gambling with a technology we don't understand and that there is no convincing evidence that e-cigarettes help people quit smoking. It may even encourage non-smokers to start.



(5)Some countries have warily embraced e-cigarettes, while others have effectively banned them. The UK has so far adopted a liberal approach, but on Friday new European legislation will come into force which will limit the size of refills and the nicotine content of the fluids. Vaping will become more restricted. So, who's right? Are e-cigarettes one of the greatest public health measures ever invented, with the potential to save millions of lives, or  (6) are they just another cunning way to keep us hooked on nicotine? I was keen to find out. The scientific consensus is that vaping, at least in the short term, is a lot safer than conventional smoking. A recent study for Public Health England concluded that e-cigarettes are 95% less harmful than normal cigarettes.
To be honest when I took up vaping I wasn't that worried about the short term health effects. What I was far more concerned about was getting hooked on nicotine. Yet as the weeks went by and I puffed away, nothing happened. When I leapt out of bed I didn't feel a longing to reach for my machine. If anything (7) I found it a bit of a chore. Chatting to experts I discovered, to my considerable surprise, that although cigarettes are highly addictive, nicotine alone may not be. Although no-one knows for sure, research in animals suggests that nicotine is far more addictive when delivered in combination with the other chemicals found in regular cigarettes. And nicotine in its pure form may have an upside. There's evidence it can help patients with Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.




The National Institute on Aging in the US has recently funded a trial of 300 patients with mild cognitive impairment (a precursor to Alzheimer's). The patients, none of whom are smokers, will be randomly allocated to either nicotine patches or placebo patches. Over the next few years they will have regular health checks, as well as memory and cognition tests. A similar, smaller study, published in 2012, found that non-smokers given nicotine patches saw improvements in memory, attention and reaction times.
But before you start slapping on the patches or firing up an e-cig you should be aware that though nicotine may help people who already have impaired memory, there's no evidence it will help   the rest of us. Although I was tested before and after doing a month of heavy vaping, the nicotine didn't enhance my brain, apart from a small improvement in my fine motor skills.
But the main health justification for e-cigarettes is that they can help those who are keen to quit smoking tobacco, quit. So do they? There have been very few randomised controlled trials, but the ones that have been done suggest it does. When (8) Horizon conducted a small study  randomly allocating a group of hardcore smokers to either e-cigs, nicotine patches or simply giving up (going cold turkey), we found the vapers and those who slapped on the patches were far more successful at abandoning their cigarettes. E-cigs are not risk free and after a month of heavy vaping there were signs of increased inflammation in my lungs (which rapidly reversed when I stopped). Nonetheless I think that for smokers (9) e-cigarettes could prove to be a game changer.
There is a huge amount at stake. A billion people worldwide spend around £500bn a year on cigarettes and around half of them will die of smoking related diseases. In the UK alone smoking kills around 100,000 a year.(10) Anything which gets people off cigarettes is going to save a lot of lives.

 Source:
 Michael Mosley, BBC News Magazine http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine


PARAPHRASE
Re-state clearly and concisely the ideas expressed in the 10 underlined phrases bring sure to reference the subject of the sentence if a pronoun is used. You may need to reformulate the whole sentence as well as change word class to do this effectively. You do not need to find synonyms for: e-cigarettes and vaping.
SUMMARY
Using your own words write a clear, concise summary of the main idea and key points raised in this article remembering to attribute sources of information. You are advised to write a first draft and then work on that to produce a good copy. You should write between 140-160 words. You will be penalized if you write more.


                                                        


mercoledì 16 ottobre 2019

MAGISTRALE - Material for 22nd October

Translate the text below into  Italian.


At last he could admit to himself that he had never met anyone he loved as much, that he had never found anyone, man or woman, who matched her seriousness. Perhaps if he had stayed with her, he would have been more focused and ambitious about his own life, he might have written those history books. It was not his kind of thing at all, but he knew that the Ennismore Quartet was eminent, and was still a revered feather of the classical music scene. He would never attend the concerts, or buy, or even look at, the boxed sets of Beethoven or Schubert. He did not want to see her photograph and discover what the years had wrought, or hear about the details of her life. He preferred to preserve her as she was in his memories, with the dandelion in her buttonhole and the piece of velvet in her hair, the canvas bag across her shoulder, and the beautiful strong-boned face with its wide and artless smile. When he thought of her, it rather amazed him, that he had let that girl with her violin go. Now, of course, he saw that her self-effacing proposal was quite irrelevant. All she had needed was the certainty of his love, and his reassurance that there was no hurry when a lifetime lay ahead of them. Love and patience-if only he had had them both at once-would surely have seen them both through. 
Ian  Mcewan , Chesil  Beach

MLI 3 LESSON MATERIAL



Complete the worksheet below for 22nd  October lesson.


 Worksheet 2
Chapter 3 – Style
  1. What is focus ?
  2. What is foregrounding?
  3. What is end focus? – give an example of end- focus with “There” used  as a dummy subject.
  4. Change the focus of the following sentence by using the passive voice:
They accused him of murder –
  1. What is rhetoric
  2. Give examples of the following
a)   Alliteration ( HEAD RHYME )
b)   Irony ( Bournville ad)
c)   Metaphor
d)   An Oxymoron
e)   Paradox
f)    Personification ( Mac)
g)   Simile
h)   Symbolism

lunedì 14 ottobre 2019

MAGISTRALE - CLASS FOR TUESDAY LESSONS

lessons on Tuesdays will now  be in  CLA OO3.

venerdì 11 ottobre 2019

IMPORTANT - LESSONS AND RICEVIMENTO CANCELLED

There will  be no  lessons or ricevimento  on  Friday, 18th  October.

MLI 3 Material for 15th October


Worksheet 1 - Read Chapter One   of Mastering Advanced English  Language (The Structure of English) then complete.

  1. Give definitions of the following terms:
Grammar 
Morphology
Syntax
Discourse
Form
Function
Phrase
Head word
Pre-modifiers
Post-modifier/qualifier

     2. Give examples of the following:
Open class words
Closed class words
Common nouns
Concrete nouns
Abstract nouns
Countable uncountable nouns
Collective nouns
modifiers
Static verbs
Dynamic verbs
Transitive verbs
Intransitive verbs
Lexical  verbs
Auxiliary verbs
Modal  verbs
The perfect aspect of verbs
The  progressive aspect
                     Finite verbs
Non-finite verbs
Adverbs of time, manner, frequency, place
Adverbs of degree
Sentence adverbs –disjuncts/conjuncts
Pronouns with  a deictic function
 The five main type of determiner
Co-ordinating conjunctions
Subordinating conjunctions
Free morphemes
Bound morphemes
Words formed by derivational morphology
 Words formed by inflectional morphology
 A noun phrase




MAGISTRALE 1 SESSIONE STRAORDINARIA LETTORATO D'INGLESE

MAGISTRALE 1:
NOVEMBER EXAM SESSION (extended to graduates of the 2nd graduation session 2018-19, and of the IV graduation session 2018-19).  Reserved for non-attending students, repeating students, workers with disabilities, students who are mothers, fathers with children under three years of age, as well as pregnant students (these conditions can be  attested through self-certification made by the interested party: download the form on the faculty's didactic page

 Saturday, November 16th, 9.00 am, Ex-poste / Marco Polo, Room 110

 To be presented on the day of the exam:
1. a valid photo identity document
2. completed self certification form (where necessary)

mercoledì 9 ottobre 2019

MLI 3 MATERIAL FOR 11th OCTOBER


Print this off for 11th  October lesson 
Cultural Awareness in a Globalized World | Ralph Strozza | TEDxNorthern Illinois University

Watch  the video  and make notes on the following:
A Changed World





  What does the cartoon imply?





Culture is the collective programming of the mind …………………………………………………………………………
…………………….( complete)



Consequences of bad marketing strategy







Indicators of culture









Scooby Doo



Market unfamiliarity






Transcreation






mercoledì 2 ottobre 2019

MLI 3 SESSIONE STRAORDINARIO ESAME SCRITTO LETTORATO D’INGLESE



APPELLO STRAORDINARIO (esteso rispettivamente ai laureandi della II sessione di laurea 2018-19 e della IV sessione di laurea 2018-19). riservati agli studenti fuori corso, ripetenti, lavoratori, portatori di disabilità alle studentesse madri e agli studenti padri con figlio/i di età inferiore a tre anni, nonché alle studentesse in stato di gravidanza (il fatto di trovarsi in una delle condizioni previste potrà essere attestato attraverso un’autocertificazione resa dall’interessato: scarica modello 
Sabato 16 Novembre, ore 9.00, Ex-poste/Marco Polo, Aula 110

Da presentare in aula il giorno dell’esame:
1. un documento di identità valido e con foto
2. il libretto giallo o LO STAMPATO da Infostud che attesta il superamento di tutti gli esami di inglese del secondo anno (NON E' CONSENTITO MOSTRARLO SUL CELLULARE).
3. autocertificazione (vedi sopra)

PRENOTAZIONI: MLI 3
dalle 12.00 del 28.10.2019 alle 12.00 del 11.11.2019 e non oltre.
MANDARE MAIL A: maria.hillan@uniroma1.it


martedì 1 ottobre 2019

MAGISTRALE 1 - MATERIAL

PLEASE DOWNLOAD/ PRINT OFF THE MATERIAL  BELOW IF YOU DID NOT RECEIVE A COPY AT  THE FIRST LESSON


1.      BIOETHICS – A REPORT
You will write a report on the Alfie Evans case which  will then  be followed by an  interpretation of the facts based on a number of sources.
1)       watch  the  video summarizing the course of events of the case and take notes:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

2)      What is your immediate reaction to what  you have seen?
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………


3)      Read the article below about the Hippocratic Oath.
In  what way has it the oath been  modified recently? Why do  you think  this is? Which  tenets of the oath  are particularly relevant to  the Evans case?
A modern successor to the Hippocratic Oath for physicians around the world has been approved by the World Medical Association. This is the first revision in a decade and reflects changes in the climate of medical ethics.
First of all, the “Declaration of Geneva” is to be called, not an “oath”, but a “pledge”. The most striking change is the emphasis on patient autonomy. A clause has been inserted into the 2017 version which says, “I will respect the autonomy and dignity of my patient”.A somewhat unusual new clause requires doctors to look after their own health: “I will attend to my own health, well-being, and abilities in order to provide care of the highest standard”.There is a new obligation on physicians to share their knowledge for the benefit of their patients and for the advancement of healthcare.
The current Declaration of Geneva is used across the world by physicians. In many countries it is actually part of the medical professional code and in some it is legally binding. However, in other countries it is either not used at all or has been adapted. The revised pledge is supposed to be a global ethical code for all physicians. WMA President Dr Yoshitake Yokokura said:
“The life of physicians today is completely different to what it was in 1948 when the original Declaration of Geneva was adopted. Since then, the Declaration has become a core document of medical ethics and a modern version of the 2,500-year old Hippocratic Oath. We hope that the Declaration approved today will be used by all physicians around the world to strengthen the profession’s determination to maintain the highest standard of health care for patients.”
It is interesting to compare the 2017 version with the 1948 version. In many respects they are strikingly different.
1948: I will maintain the utmost respect for human life from the time of conception 
2017: I will maintain the utmost respect for human life.
1948: even under threat, I will not use my medical knowledge contrary to the laws of humanity 
2017: I will not use my medical knowledge to violate human rights and civil liberties, even under threat.
1948: I will maintain by all the means in my power, the honor and the noble traditions of the medical profession; my colleagues will be my brothers
2017: I will foster the honour and noble traditions of the medical profession
AS A MEMBER OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION:
I SOLEMNLY PLEDGE to dedicate my life to the service of humanity;
THE HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF MY PATIENT will be my first consideration;
I WILL RESPECT the autonomy and dignity of my patient;
I WILL MAINTAIN the utmost respect for human life;
I WILL NOT PERMIT considerations of age, disease or disability, creed, ethnic origin, gender, nationality, political affiliation, race, sexual orientation, social standing, or any other factor to intervene between my duty and my patient;
I WILL RESPECT the secrets that are confided in me, even after the patient has died;
I WILL PRACTISE my profession with conscience and dignity and in accordance with good medical practice;
I WILL FOSTER the honour and noble traditions of the medical profession;
I WILL GIVE to my teachers, colleagues, and students the respect and gratitude that is their due;
I WILL SHARE my medical knowledge for the benefit of the patient and the advancement of healthcare;
I WILL ATTEND TO my own health, well-being, and abilities in order to provide care of the highest standard;
I WILL NOT USE my medical knowledge to violate human rights and civil liberties, even under threat;
I MAKE THESE PROMISES solemnly, freely, and upon my honour.



………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

4)      The Religious and legal Perspectives
Read the article below. Do  you agree with  the American or the European  stance?
Alfie Evans and Christianity
The case of Alfie Evans has resonated with Catholic and Christian communities around the world. They see in his case a fundamental conflict between the actions of the British legal system and their religious belief in both the right to life and the right of parents to determine a child’s medical care. Some religious activists have banded together in support of the Evans family, calling themselves “Alfie’s Army,” and regularly protest outside the hospital where Alfie is being treated.
In response to the outcry from the Catholic community, the Italian government offered young Alfie citizenship, arranging for him to travel to the Bambino Gesu hospital in Italy. Even Pope Francis, who met with Tom Evans in Rome earlier this month, has weighed in on the case.
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/507818066814590976/KNG-IkT9_normal.jpeg

Moved by the prayers and immense solidarity shown little Alfie Evans, I renew my appeal that the suffering of his parents may be heard and that their desire to seek new forms of treatment may be granted.

Pope Francis also tweeted out his sadness in response to the news of Evans’ death:
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/507818066814590976/KNG-IkT9_normal.jpeg

I am deeply moved by the death of little Alfie. Today I pray especially for his parents, as God the Father receives him in his tender embrace.
But the swelling of support for Alfie has not changed the British legal system’s mind. On Tuesday (April 24), justice Hayden ruled one final time that the family could not send Alfie to Italy for treatment. Moving Alfie, he said, would only make him more vulnerable to an infection and other dangers, for an outcome that would certainly not help him live any longer.

Who has final say over an infant’s medical care?

Alfie Evans is not the first baby whose medical condition sparked similar debates. Last year, Charlie Gard, a terminally ill British baby, died in July 2017 a day after the British High Court ruled that his life support could be withdrawn. Charlie’s case had attracted the attention of world leaders from Pope Francis to US president Donald Trump.
Extreme medical cases like Alfie Evans and Charlie Gard illustrate the moral dilemma of end-of-life care for sick children. It’s easy to understand why the parents of sick children would cling to hope; as long as their children are alive, they believe, there’s still a chance they might recover. But the British legal system takes the view that, in some cases, keeping children artificially alive only prolongs their suffering.
For outside observers, whether one sides with the parents or the state often falls along national and cultural fault lines. American conservatives are up in arms about Alfie, and many other Americans may well feel the same way. David French recently wrote in the conservative National Review that, because of the “fundamentally religious element to America’s founding,” the legal system would not consider intervening to determine the course of Alfie’s medical care, which would be left up to his family. He argues that Americans innately respect parents’ rights and liberties above the state’s: “Raised against the backdrop of American liberty, there are millions of Americans who understand this reality almost instinctively, without knowing an ounce of constitutional law,” he writes. “Their very spirit rebels against Great Britain’s actions.”
But European legal and political systems are based on the primacy of the state’s authority in extreme situations like a dispute over a child’s end-of-life medical care. That’s partly because European laws are informed by human rights standards laid down in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which all European states are party to but the United States is not, as well as other European treaties like the European Convention on Human Rights.
“In Europe, disputes over children’s medical care, including end-of-life medical care, may result in a limitation of parental authority, justified by the protection of the child’s rights and best interests, which includes the right to have one’s dignity and physical integrity protected,” Ton Liefaard, who holds the UNICEF chair in children’s rights at Leiden Law School in The Netherlands, told Quartz.
Europeans themselves, meanwhile, are often divided along religious fault lines. British neonatal ethicist Dominic Wilson offers a view into the thinking behind secular support for the British legal system’s decision, explaining that the goal is not to end Alfie’s life but to provide him with palliative care. “Palliative care is not euthanasia,” he writes in a blog post. “It is about providing ‘intensive caring’ rather than intensive medical care. It does not end the child’s life. Rather, it supports the child, and the child’s family, for as long or as short as they remain with us.”
Whether one sides with the law or the rights of parents in this case, it’s impossible not to feel compassion for Alfie’s parents. Writing about Alfie’s father, Tom, in his ruling, justice Hayden laid out his understanding of the issue. “His core dilemma, from which he struggles to escape, is that whilst he recognizes and understands fully that the weight of the evidence spells out the futility of Alfie’s situation he is, as a father, unable to relinquish hope,” Hayden wrote. No parent could blame him.
https://qz.com/1264345/alfie-evans-life-and-death-highlights-the-vast-gap-between-the-us-and-europe-on-right-to-life/



5)      Watch  this biased interpretation of the case. What is the expert’s reasoning based on?


6)      Complete the text below by inserting one word only in the gaps.   Before doing so, read the text through at  least once.
The tragic case of Charlie Gard will be reconsidered by the High Court in London on July 13.  ……………. its first ruling in April, baby Charlie’s plight has attracted international attention,  ……………. comments from the Pope and Donald Trump.
The case is significant for its poignancy and its international profile,   but …………….  legal significance arises from the dispute between Charlie’s parents, Chris Gard and Connie Yates, and his medical team. ……………. dispute includes their opinions on Charlie’s condition and the likely benefits of an experimental medical treatment. ……………. disagreements are uncommon, but when they arise there are a number of reasons why they need an independent arbiter to ……………. the competing issues. Charlie suffers from a rare and debilitating illness called encephalomyopathic mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome.  ……………. a result of his condition, Charlie has already suffered irreversible brain damage. His parents ……………. to take him to the US for an experimental treatment, called nucleoside therapy but both courts and the doctors at Great Ormond Street Hospital have so far concluded that it ……………. be “futile”.
Charlie’s parents have the legal capacity to consent to the treatment or to the withdrawal of treatment on  ……………. of their child and some would argue that the parents’ view should prevail. But as Lord Justice McFarlane stated in the Court of Appeal:
It is well-recognised that parents in the appalling position that these and other parents can find  ……………. may lose their objectivity and be willing to ‘try anything’, even if, …………….  viewed objectively, their preferred option is not in a child’s best interests.
Equally parents and patients ……………. not be left without the ability to review the expert decisions of medical professionals. In this sense all power ……………. checks and balances even that wielded by those with…………….  but the best of motives. The question ……………. becomes who is best placed to resolve these competing but equally well-intentioned viewpoints?
       Who decides and why?
As justice secretary, David Lidington, recently said, the government has “no role to play” in the resolution of this case. ……………. the UK’s constitutional arrangements, government policy and the law all require that the courts are used to resolve …………….  disputes. No one is above the law and the rule of law itself means that medical decisions are reviewable in the courts. ……………., when doing so, the courts are not asked to find in favour of either the parents or the medical team. ……………. are they asked to consider what they would do as a parent or doctor. While they will consider evidence from ……………. parties, the sole issue for the court is to identify what is in the best interests of the patient.This process ensures that medical opinion is rigorously tested and, where appropriate, it provides legitimacy to the difficult decisions that doctors are called  ……………. to make about life and death.For a liberal democracy it is crucial that all evidence is heard in a public forum that is independent and impartial, subject to an appeals process, and which regards the best interests of the patient as the paramount consideration.
The next hearing
 ……………. far the courts have concluded that it would not be in Charlie’s best interests to undergo the experimental treatment and that it would be in Charlie’s best interests, and therefore lawful, for his life support to be withdrawn. Before the court…………….  change this view, additional evidence would ……………. to be produced that undermined its earlier conclusion that the proposed treatment would be futile. The purpose of the July 13 hearing is to explore ……………. such evidence exists.…………….  the case has been emotionally fraught, evidentially it has been relatively straightforward as all the UK medical experts, including an independent consultant paediatric neurologist instructed by the parents, have agreed that the experimental treatment would have no benefit. Even the US doctor offering to treat Charlie …………….  that the treatment had not been tested on Charlie’s exact condition. Mr Justice Francis summarised his evidence as follows:
While there was reason to be hopeful that the treatment might make a modest difference to life expectancy, it almost certainly could not undo the structural brain damage that had taken ……………..
If fresh evidence is now produced that supports the treatment and that evidence is disputed by the hospital doctors, the judge will have a much harder judgment to …………….. However, in a society that recognises the fundamental importance of the individual citizen and their human rights, it is a task that properly ……………. to the courts and no other.   
                                                                           
 The Conversation , Nicholas Clapham,   School of Law, University of Surrey



7)      Write a report on this case. Begin with  a brief summary of events. Then, using the sources above, write your interpretation of the events  and, in conclusion, judged on what you have read, give your opinion.

Further reading : The Children Act, Ian McEwan